The growing rift between Vice-President Michael Usi and the UTM Party leadership has raised serious questions about the future of the party and its ability to serve as a cohesive political force. At the heart of the dispute lies Usi’s refusal to recognize the legitimacy of the current UTM leadership and his rejection of summons to appear before the party’s disciplinary committee. This feud is eroding the party’s credibility and unity at a time when it should be consolidating its efforts to remain relevant in Malawi’s political landscape.
The Need for Constructive Dialogue
The first step toward resolving this impasse is for both parties to prioritize constructive dialogue. Political analyst Sainala Kalebe aptly noted that the lack of intra-party dialogue is a key factor in this standoff. Usi and the UTM leadership must recognize that continued public confrontation benefits neither party nor the Malawian people who expect effective governance and accountability. An independent mediator, possibly from a neutral body such as the Public Affairs Committee (PAC), should be engaged to facilitate a transparent discussion aimed at addressing the concerns of both sides.
Transparency and Accountability
The allegations surrounding the management of condolence funds have become a flashpoint in this dispute. To restore public trust and internal unity, the UTM leadership should initiate an independent audit of the K61 million in question. This would clarify the roles of all parties involved, including Usi, and dispel any lingering doubts about financial impropriety. Transparency in financial matters is not just a legal obligation but also a moral one, especially in a political party that aims to uphold the public’s trust.
Adhering to Party Principles
Both Usi and the current UTM leadership must recommit themselves to the principles enshrined in the party’s constitution. If Usi believes that constitutional violations occurred during the national convention, he should present his grievances through appropriate channels, supported by evidence. Conversely, the current leadership must demonstrate a willingness to address these concerns fairly and without prejudice.
The Bigger Picture
The ongoing squabble risks alienating UTM’s support base and diminishing its standing as a political entity. With Michael Usi’s stature as Vice-President and a respected public figure, and the UTM’s history of bold political ambitions under the late Saulos Chilima, the stakes are too high for either side to allow this conflict to spiral further. Both parties must rise above personal grievances and focus on the party’s broader mission of contributing to Malawi’s democratic and developmental aspirations.
Recommendations
Engage an Independent Mediator: A neutral third party should be tasked with facilitating dialogue and ensuring that discussions are objective and constructive.
Conduct an Independent Audit: The K61 million condolence funds must be audited by a reputable external firm, with findings made public to clear the air.
Strengthen Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: The UTM must establish clear and trusted procedures for addressing internal grievances, reducing the likelihood of such disputes escalating into public feuds.
Reaffirm Commitment to Constitutionalism: Both sides must respect the party’s constitution and work collaboratively to address any alleged violations through established legal and organizational frameworks.
Prioritize Unity and Public Service: The leadership should refocus on their shared goals, leveraging their collective strength to serve Malawians effectively.
Conclusion
The UTM Party’s leadership and Vice-President Michael Usi have an opportunity to demonstrate that political maturity and accountability are not just ideals but actionable principles. By choosing reconciliation and transparency over discord, they can set an example for other political entities in Malawi. The time to act is now—for the sake of the party, its supporters, and the nation at large.
0 Comments